Marko Lenz vs Neil Pauffley Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W W W L L
Form
L W W L W L L L W LHead-2-Head: Lenz 1 - 0 Pauffley
They have played 3 sets in total, with Lenz winning 2 and Pauffley winning 1. The last match between Lenz and Pauffley was at the Germany F12, 11-08-2014, Second, Clay with Marko Lenz getting the victory 7-6(2) 3-6 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marko Lenz | 1 |
| Neil Pauffley | 0 |
Germany F12(11-08-2014)
7
6
3
6
7
5
| Lenz | Stats | Pauffley |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 785 | Highest Rank | 406 |
| 33 | Age | 35 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 5 |
| 49% (40-42) | Career Total W/L | 52% (241-223) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Raducanu VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 3-6 7-5 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 17 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marko Lenz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
James Mcgee
Player
Marko Lenz
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-6(2) 3-6 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-0 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Neil Pauffley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Neil Pauffley
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Neil Pauffley
Player
Daniil Zarichanskyy
53%
(
10 of
19)
1st Serve %
29%
(
4 of
14)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
100%
(
10 of
10)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
12 of
14)
26
Total Points Won
7
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Neil Pauffley
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Neil Pauffley
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
59 of
84)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Neil Pauffley
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Neil Pauffley
Player
Aidan Mchugh
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ronan Joncour
Player
Neil Pauffley
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Neil Pauffley
Player
Adam Jones
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Neil Pauffley
Player
Elliott Farmer
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
8 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Neil Pauffley
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
24 of
34)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49% (40/42) | Win/Loss | 52% (241/223) |
| 46% (86/102) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (539/507) |
| 49% (879/928) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (4980/4738) |
| 0% (0/1) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (87/75) |
| 51% (27/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (27/31) |
| 48% (13/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (102/86) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 45% (25/31) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 22 | Aces Total | 917 |
| 0.03 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 29 | Total Double Faults | 841 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 602.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 622.63 |
| 52% (177/341) | 1st Serve % | 60% (7484/12431) |
| 68% (121/177) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (5265/7484) |
| 41% (68/164) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2339/4947) |
| 39% (12/31) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (615/1377) |
| 37% (114/310) | Return Points Win % | 41% (5427/13138) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (4/8) | Challenger W/L | 37% (15/26) |
| 52% (36/33) | Futures W/L | 54% (226/193) |
| 49% (40/82) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (236/455) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 48% (12/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (58/121) |
| 75% (18/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (64/126) |
| 88% (34/30) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (229/202) |
| 12% (34/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (229/27) |
| 21% (48/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (234/38) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
